Movies have been divided into multiple parts throughout the history of cinema. This is not a new concept, but it has become more frequent as the world of cinema has evolved. Film began to be divided into several parts in the form of serials, usually ranging from chapters of 10 to 30 minutes in length. As the concept progresses, longer films (such as three to four hours) will have intermissions in between, so that the audience can get up and stretch or refill their snacks/drinks. In the 21st century, big budget blockbusters divide their films into at least two parts. This is especially true with the novels adapted in films such as Harry Potter and the deathly hallows or The hobbit.
There is a big difference between split and sequel movies. Series usually have a time skip period (usually a year skip) between the events of its predecessor and the events that occur in the sequel. The movie continues to be split into two parts almost immediately after the end of Part 1, with a bit of time skipping. Some of the new adaptations (mostly the last book) are split into two parts simply because there is too much content for one movie. But what are the main reasons for dividing blockbusters into multiple parts? These are always the three main reasons: creative, practical and financial intentions.
Creativity has a huge role in making anything – books, movies, artwork, and so on. When a movie is split into multiple parts, one of the main reasons for this may be the creative direction. This means that the film is intentionally divided for story purposes. A good example of this is the following Mission: Impossible installment. Mission: Impossible – Dead reckoning It will be released on July 12 as part of a two-part movie.
Film director Christopher McQuarrie and lead actor Tom Cruise agreed they were happy with the movie, but it was too long. McQuarrie himself said, “We knew we had a 2-hour, 40-minute movie. Every scene in it was essential.” He thinks Mission Impossible movies are 20-minute segments, so he took the last 40 minutes for the first segment. He knew what was the end of the first part and what was the beginning of the second.
Dune part two is another great example of a film split due to creative direction. 2021 movie Dune is an adaptation of Frank Herbert’s 1965 science fiction novel of the same name. In March 2018, director Denis Villeneuve stated that his goal is to adapt the novel into a two-part film series.
He felt that the novel was too big and complex for just one movie. So, Dune Part OneThe plot of the novel is the first half of the novel. Dune part two, which will be released on November 3, will cover the rest of the book. unlike dead reckoningincision Dune Into two parts the creative direction was planned.
When a movie becomes too long or overbearing, the easiest way to solve this problem without cutting out too many scenes is to split the movie. Who wants to sit through a three-hour movie without stopping to pee? Practicality plays one of the biggest roles in film segmentation. Directors don’t want their audience to just walk up and leave a movie whenever they feel it’s unnecessarily long.
Takes Spider-Man: Through the Spider-Verse, For example. The Spider-Verse spans the comics not only across other multiverses but in the separate stories of spiders like Earth-65 Gwen Stacey. The bigger picture is very complex, and every detail matters. Makes sense to be a cinematic via spider-verse It will have a bigger story compared to In the spider verse.
This is also an example of a creative decision, but we cannot ignore the practical application of this logic. Think of it this way: The Spider-Verse is an ever-expanding collection of Marvel’s many Earths. We saw a lot of spiders via spider-verse already but only a handful of them knew (such as Spider-Punk and Jessica Drew).
Some familiar spiders, like Spider-Man Noir, have made a reappearance, and others are set to return for the next sequel. Maybe in the second part. Behind the spider verse, we will get to know more spiders like silk or even Mary Jane spider woman. Such a big story would require at least a sequel if not multiple parts.
Of course, no production company or director is free from financial gain or loss. Making a movie requires some sort of initial budget, and the creators make money to offset the cost of production. It all depends on how well the movie does at the box office. Splitting a movie into multiple parts is a huge risk if it fails to meet box office expectations.
However, major franchises tend to meet beyond box office expectations despite not always getting the best audience response. This is particularly the case with longer, big-budget franchises. In some cases, multiple parts are a blatant cash grab. But for most people, there’s an obvious love that goes into the franchise, and everyone wants it to end with something incredible. Let’s talk about the latest version of the program The Fast and the Furious Franchise: X is fast.
X is fast is one part of what was thought to be a two-part finale. But actor Vin Diesel recently stated that the film is the beginning of the end of the trilogy. This statement has not been confirmed by Universal Pictures. If true, would they be financially able to make a trilogy? It is very possible.
The first part of X is fast It has a budget of over $340 million, which makes it the most expensive The Fast and the Furious One of the most expensive movies of all time. The movie would have to make close to $850 million to reach its standard. With the franchise’s popularity, you would think hitting that mark wouldn’t be too hard to manage. To date, the film has grossed over $650 million worldwide. A trilogy might not be the smartest idea, but it might be worth the risk to Universal Pictures for the financial gain.